Pages

Sunday, 31 December 2017

In search of EUROPA - SZCZECIN What Democracy needs? Nationality or Citizenship?


To every place there belongs a story . . .




   

 

SZCZECIN

 

 

Szczecin is a sister city of Kingston upon Hull and Lübeck!




Szczecin is a city close to the border with Germany, but as with many Polish cities in the western half of the country, Szczecin was once known by its German name, because it was before 1945 the German city of Stettin.



The border between Poland and Germany was defined along the course of two rivers, the Oder and the Neisse, referred to as the Oder-Neisse line,and is essentially an arbitrary and political border drawn up and agreed at the Potsdam Conference (17 July to 2 August 1945). See Drawing a line

The physical geography suggesting this border involves two rivers, the Oder and Lusatian Neisse rivers. 
The aftermath of World War in Europe included elements that are a strange mix of both punishment and re-construction of Germany. For the Soviet Union this was a sweet revenge. The new border meant a huge part of German territory became Poland. At the same time the eastern part of Poland, the Polish Ukraine, had been taken by the USSR.  

The territorial changes of Poland immediately after World War II were very extensive. In 1945, after the defeat of Nazi Germany, Poland's borders were redrawn in accordance with the decisions made first by the Allies at the Tehran Conference of 1943 where the Soviet Union demanded the recognition of the military outcome of the top secret Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939 of which the West was unaware. 

The same Soviet stance was repeated by Josef Stalin again at the Yalta Conference with Roosevelt and Churchill in February 1945, but a lot more forcefully in the face of the looming German defeat. 

The new borders were ratified at the Potsdam Conference of August 1945 exactly as proposed by Stalin who already controlled the whole of East-central Europe.

At the time of the making the LODE cargo in 1992 the border between Poland and Germany was settled, but only agreed and ratified within recent months! 

The German–Polish Border Treaty of 1990 finally settled the issue of the Polish–German border, which in terms of international law had been pending since 1945.  

The treaty was signed by the foreign ministers of Poland and Germany, Krzysztof Skubiszewski and Hans-Dietrich Genscher, on 14 November 1990 in Warsaw, ratified by the Polish Sejm on 26 November 1991 and the German Bundestag on 16 December 1991, and entered into force with the exchange of the instruments of ratification on 16 January 1992.


The result of this historic moment was that the borders of Poland had returned to the boundaries of the first political and state entity of Poland of a thousand years ago!




The LODE compass was created close to the border with Germany and overlooking the city of Szczecin. In 1992 this place and part of the LODE-zone was significant in that it was beyond the borders of the European Community, as the European Union was known then. To this place the stories that wrap the LODE cargo of questions are stories from within Polish borders. However, Polish borders have come and gone over the centuries, in such strange and radical ways, that Poland as a country, as a nation, as a concept, as a culture and a language is profoundly informing in a search for Europa. 

This physical geography, these territories are also "beyond" the regions of shared historical identity for the settled constituencies in the Liverpool-Hull LODE-zone, but for migrant communities it is a living "presence", albeit that these territories are "elsewhere"!










However, the historical experience of a European state that has, it turns out, only a loose association with a particular territory, is what the unfolding story of Poland inevitably reveals, and therefore challenges many of the basic notions many modern Europeans hold, that; a particular area of the surface of our planet, bounded by geographic or political boundaries, and that such a territory, is potentially a "country", and that "countries" are the basis for "nations", or part of a larger nation state, union, federation or confederation.



Up until 1945 Stettin had been a city with a "German history"!

In the second half of the 12th century, a group of German tradesmen ("multus populus Teutonicorum" from various parts of the Holy Roman Empire) settled in the city around St. Jacob's Church, which was donated in 1180 by Beringer, a trader from Bamberg, and consecrated in 1187.

Hohenkrug (now in Szczecin-Struga) was the first village in the Duchy of Pomerania that was clearly recorded as German (villa teutonicorum) in 1173.







Ostsiedlung, literally east settling, and in English called the German eastward expansion, accelerated in Pomerania during the 13th century. Duke Barnim I of Pomerania granted Stettin a local government charter in 1237, separating the German settlement from the Slavic community settled around the St. Nicholas Church in the neighbourhood of Kessin (Polish: Chyzin). In the charter, the Slavs were put under German jurisdiction.

On 2 December 1261, Barnim I allowed Jewish settlement in Stettin in accordance with the Magdeburg law, in a privilege renewed in 1308 and 1371. The Jewish Jordan family was granted citizenship in 1325, but none of the 22 Jews allowed to settle in the duchy in 1481 lived in the city, and in 1492, all Jews in the duchy were ordered to convert to Christianity or leave – this order remained effective throughout the rest of the Griffin era.


Stettin was part of the federation of Wendish towns, a precursor of the Hanseatic League, in 1283. The anti-Slavic policies of German merchants and craftsmen intensified in this period, resulting in measures such as bans on people of Slavic descent joining craft guilds, a doubling of customs tax for Slavic merchants, and bans against public usage of their native language. The more prosperous Slavic citizens were forcibly stripped of their possessions, which were then handed over to Germans. In 1514 the guild of tailors added a Wendenparagraph to its statutes, banning Slavs.



It is not the land that is the foundation of a nation, be it fatherland or motherland, it is formed out of a people, feelings, shared language and belief systems, ideas and identity!



Religion - "the opium of the people"?  









Szczecin, as mentioned above, was, until 1945, the German city of Stettin, a major Prussian port city serving the needs of Berlin, and with German industries, including shipbuilding, chemical and food industries, and machinery construction. From the 1840's, Stettin became connected to the major German and Pomeranian cities by railways, and a navigable connection to the Bay of Pomerania was enhanced by the construction of the Kaiserfahrt (now Piast) canal. The city was also a scientific centre.

Before Stettin became part of the German Empire in 1871, with the unification of Germany, the city had a chequered history when conflicts between the German states, Denmark and Sweden occurred. In 1570, a congress was held at Stettin ending the Northern Seven Years' War,  and whilst Stettin had tended to side with Denmark, and Stralsund tended toward Sweden – generally, the Duchy of Pomerania tried to maintain neutrality.

Stettin was one of only three places allowed to coin money in the Upper Saxon Circle of the Holy Roman Empire, the other two places being Leipzig and Berlin. However, before the Thirty Years' War reached Pomerania, the city, as well as the entire duchy, declined economically due to the decrease in the importance of the Hanseatic League economically and politically.

The Thirty Years' War had its impact upon the whole region and resulted in several partitions of the Duchy of Pomerania, and exemplifiying the fluid political situation in Europe when it comes to determining, and settling, political, national and cultural geographical domains throughout all European history.



Stettin and Pomerania. Empires, borderlands, partitions and The Thirty Years' War 





Christian democracy? 
Have Christian teachings shaped European values and conservative politics?




Secularism versus religion? 
A new 'civil war'?








Freedom of religion and the Golden Liberty 
The right to worship freely was a basic right given to all inhabitants of the independent Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth throughout the 15th and early 16th century. Complete freedom of religion was officially recognized in Poland in 1573 during the Warsaw Confederation.















Szczecin is now a Polish city, essentially separate from the fact of a physical geographic reality, and because it is inhabited by people who know they are Poles, and that they live in a country, a nation, that is Poland, even though they follow generations of the displacement of populations across this part of Europe!




People and the city!










Identity and the city: The Shipyards of Szczecin tell the story!



December 1970: When Polish workers’ revolt threatened Stalinist rule!

On the website In Defence of Marxism, published by International Marxist Tendency, a recent page marks the anniversary of the December 1970 Polish protests – or ‘Black Thursday’ – when the workers of the coastal cities of Gdańsk, Szczecin, Gdynia and Elbląg rose in protest against a huge increase in the prices of basic foods, and were harshly repressed by the People’s Army. 

The cost of striking against price rises was high: 46 workers and students were killed and thousands injured in the stand-offs, just a week before Christmas.



Solidarity







The right to protest and the right to strike?















Eroding Checks and Balances




Rule of Law and Human Rights Under Attack in Poland





Universal human rights?











Why are there protests in Poland? Here are the five things you need to know.





Poland cries foul as EU triggers ‘nuclear option’ over judicial independence
European commission tells member states that Polish government has put fundamental democratic values at risk


Poland appears to be dismantling its own hard-won democracy








How Poland Is Standing Up To Right-Wing Populism
Widespread protests demonstrate the limits of Polish leaders’ radical, right-wing agenda.



It’s not just Trump. Authoritarian populism is rising across the West. Here’s why.

We’re seeing a deep and strong cultural backlash against changes in social values

Here’s why. Populist authoritarianism can best be explained as a cultural backlash in Western societies against long-term, ongoing social change.

Over recent decades, the World Values Survey shows that Western societies have been getting gradually more liberal on many social issues, especially among the younger generation and well-educated middle class. That includes egalitarian attitudes toward sex roles, tolerance of fluid gender identities and LGBT rights, support for same-sex marriage, tolerance of diversity, and more secular values, as well as what political scientists call emancipative values, engagement in directly assertive forms of democratic participation, and cosmopolitan support for agencies of global governance.

This long-term generational shift threatens many traditionalists’ cultural values. Less educated and older citizens fear becoming marginalized and left behind within their own countries.


RED IS BAD?
What about the attitudes of young people?














Identity Politics in Poland















Ukrainian immigrants are powering Poland’s economy




The monument to Joseph Conrad in Gdynia, Poland

Joseph Conrad was born Józef Teodor Konrad Korzeniowski; 3 December 1857 in Berdychiv, Ukraine, then part of the Russian Empire; but had previously been part of the independent Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
On 3 August 1924, Conrad died at his house, Oswalds, in Bishopsbourne, Kent, England, a British citizen. He was buried at Canterbury, under a misspelled version of his original Polish name. On his gravestone are lines from Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene which he had chosen as the epigraph to his last complete novel, The Rover:
    Sleep after toyle, port after stormie seas,

    Ease after warre, death after life, doth greatly please



The borders of Europe
In 1992 when the LODE project was first realized, the eastern border of the European Economic Community along the LODE-Line and LODE-zone was a few miles west of Szczecin









Fish over the frontier! Part of the new eastern border of the European Union! Land art!




Future locations for the creation of a set of new compasses for a LODE cargo point in a direction along the LODE-Line towards the Ukraine and beyond, beyond the border with Poland and within the borders of the present nation state of the Ukraine.

To every place there belongs a story . . .


     

This blog-post is a matrix that originates first in the context of an artistic activity that relates to this place, Szczecin, and then connections multiply through processes of association, suggesting links, articulations and juxtapositions that the contemporary information wrap affords us, in a particular and contemporary type of consciousness, where the "loop" or "ricorso" helps the zig zagging necessary to see what is going on.


That's just the way it is . . . but don't you believe them . . .




Monday, 25 December 2017

In search of EUROPA - LINKEN Boundaries, Borders and Barriers


In 1992 the LODE-Line crossed the eastern boundary of the European Community on the border between a recently re-unified Germany and Poland at LINKEN. Poland joined the European Union in 2004, and in 2017 the LODE-Line crosses the eastern border of the EU on the frontiers Poland shares with Belarus and the Ukraine. 










LODE journeys across Europe in 1992 included travelling from the North Sea coast of Germany to the German border with Poland. In 1992 this border was the eastern boundary of the EC, the European Community as the EU called itself then. 


The Maastricht Treaty established the European Union. Representatives from 12 countries, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom, signed the Treaty on 7 February 1992The parliaments in each country then ratified the Treaty, in some cases holding referendums. The Maastricht Treaty officially came into force on 1 November 1993 and the European Union was officially established. Since then, a further 16 countries have joined the EU and adopted the rules set out in the Maastricht Treaty or in the treaties that followed later.

Five things you need to know about the Maastricht Treaty

The European Central Bank has a webpage that set out the five things you need to know about the Maastricht Treaty.

1. It established the European Union

The Maastricht Treaty, officially known as the Treaty on European Union, marked the beginning of “a new stage in the process of creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe”. It laid the foundations for a single currency, the euro, and significantly expanded cooperation between European countries in a number of new areas: 
  • European citizenship was created, allowing citizens to reside in and move freely between MemberStates; 
  • a common foreign and security policy was established; 
  • closer cooperation between police and the judiciary in criminal matters was agreed.

2. It was signed by 12 countries

Representatives from 12 countries signed the Treaty on 7 February 1992 – Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.
The parliaments in each country then ratified the Treaty, in some cases holding referendums. The Maastricht Treaty officially came into force on 1 November 1993 and the European Union was officially established.
Since then, a further 16 countries have joined the EU and adopted the rules set out in the Maastricht Treaty or in the treaties that followed later.

3. It laid the foundations for the euro

The Maastricht Treaty paved the way for the creation of a single European currency – the euro. It was the culmination of several decades of debate on increasing economic cooperation in Europe. The Treaty also established the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European System of Central Banks and describes their objectives. The main objective for the ECB is to maintain price stability, i.e. to safeguard the value of the euro.
The idea of a single currency for Europe was first proposed in the early 1960s by the European Commission. However, an unstable economic landscape in the 1970s meant that the project was brought to a halt.
European leaders revived the idea of a single currency in 1986 and committed to a three-stage transition process in 1989. The Maastricht Treaty formally established these stages:
  • Stage 1 (from 1 July 1990 to 31 December 1993): introduction of free movement of capital between Member States
  • Stage 2 (from 1 January 1994 to 31 December 1998): increased cooperation between national central banks and the increased alignment of Member States’ economic policies
  • Stage 3 (from 1 January 1999 to today): gradual introduction of the euro together with the implementation of a single monetary policy, for which the ECB is responsible

4. It introduced the criteria that countries must meet to join the euro

Along with setting out the timeline for the introduction of the single currency, the Treaty also established rules on how the euro would work in practice. This included how to determine if countries were ready to join the euro.
The purpose of these particular rules, sometimes referred to as the Maastricht criteria or the convergence criteria, is to ensure price stability is maintained in the euro area even when new countries join the currency. The rules work to ensure that countries joining are stable in the following areas:
  • inflation
  • levels of public debt
  • interest rates
  • exchange rate

5. It was a giant leap forward for European integration

Since the signing of the Maastricht Treaty, European countries have grown closer together while some policy areas such as economic and fiscal policies remain at national level. European leaders have agreed on additional steps to promote further integration between European states:
  • the Stability and Growth Pact was agreed in 1997 to ensure that countries followed sound budgetary policies
  • the European Stability Mechanism was established to provide financial assistance to euro area countries experiencing or threatened by severe financing problems
  • the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Board were created after the financial crisis to make the European banking system safer, as well as to increase financial integration and stability
  • Today, more than 510 million citizens from 28 Member States enjoy the benefits of European cooperation. And 25 years after the roadmap towards the euro was agreed, the euro has become the world’s second most traded currency and is part of the daily life of 340 million citizens in 19 countries.


This fifth element (not to be confused with Luc Besson's crazy science-fi film of 1997) is questionably a typical example of of post-fact justification and with a gloss that cracks under scrutiny. 

This is the bureaucratic dream that has become a nightmare for 340 million citizens in 19 countries.



Looking back to 1992, it certainly was a giant leap for the bureacracy, the elite technocrats, and the leading politicians of the EC at the time, but the lack of an appropriate architecture for a necessary, in political terms, a democratic accountability, has meant that for many Europeans the leap has turned out to become a fall, and many are now questioning the purpose of the European Union project.

A union to abolish war in Europe?

Linken is place on the border with Poland. 

And Linken is on the Oder-Neisse line!







How old is this border?














Good neighbours?








"Germany’s entry alongside France into a battle between the European Commission and Poland over the rule of law increases the likelihood of unprecedented EU action to punish Warsaw."

This may be a watershed moment in the dispute over an overhaul of the judiciary and other steps taken by PiS which Brussels says undermine democracy in the largest ex-communist EU state.





More a "takeover" than a union?



The reunification was not a merger that created a third state out of the two. Rather, West Germany effectively absorbed East Germany. 



Reunification Day in Goodbye Lenin 

Accordingly, on Unification Day, 3 October 1990, the German Democratic Republic ceased to exist, and five new Federal States on its former territory joined the Federal Republic of Germany. East and West Berlin were reunited and joined the Federal Republic as a full-fledged Federal City-State. Under this model, the Federal Republic of Germany, now enlarged to include the five states of the former German Democratic Republic plus the reunified Berlin, continued legally to exist under the same legal personality that was founded in May 1949.








Varoufakis . . .
Why did the Europeans create the euro?
The corrupt ruling classes of Greece, Italy, Spain and their ilk were empowered by pledging to transfer their power to Brussels and Frankfurt. The French elites did indeed fear the Germans. And the German people had reason to fear that fear, as well as their own nation state's capacity to self-destruct through extreme belligerence.
It is almost an instinct of those who are critical of the euro to blame its adverse effects on Germany and the Germans. I have always opposed this tendency for two reasons. First, there is no such thing as 'the Germans'. Or 'the Greeks'. Or 'the French' for that matter.
'you are all individuals', as Brian famously told his unwanted followers in Monty Python's classic comedy. The serious point here is that there is a great deal more divergence in character, virtue and opinion among Greeks and among Germans than there is between Germans and Greeks. The second reason I have always resisted the habitual censure of Germany is that, if the debate is allowed to stoop to this stereotypical level, Paris bears greater responsibility than Berlin for the euro's faults.
Varoufakis then refers to an article in the French conservative daily Le Figaro published back in 1992 two days after Black Wednesday and two days before french voters were to deliver their verdict on the Maastricht Treaty.
'the opponents of Maastricht fear that the common currency and the new central bank will fortify the superiority of the Deutsche Mark and the Bundesbank. But the exact opposite will happen. If it comes to Maastricht, Germany will have to share its financial might with others. "Germany will pay," they said in the 1920's. Today Germany does pay. Maastricht is the Treaty of Versailles without a war.'
No German, indeed no European, could forgive such sentiments, and none would expect anything less from the Bundesbank than a plan for making france's conservative establishment, of which Le Figaro is a distinguished part, eat its words. The desperate struggle the French elites were caught in to persuade the sceptical French electorate to vote 'yes' in the Maastricht referendum (which almost produced a 'no') is no excuse. The 1919 Versailles Treaty condemned Germans to unspeakable misery, humiliated a proud nation and primed it to be taken over by Nazi thugs.



To every place there belongs a story . . .



This blog-post is a matrix that originates first in the context of an artistic activity that relates to this place, Linken, and then connections multiply through processes of association, suggesting links, articulations and juxtapositions that the contemporary information wrap affords us, in a particular and contemporary type of consciousness, where the "loop" or "ricorso" helps the zig zagging necessary to see what is going on.

That's just the way it is . . . but don't you believe them . . .